Call of Duty Modern Warfare III EARLY REVIEW - Good or Bad?

Translate

Why should Multiplayer or Zombies be restricted? The base game, albeit short and anticlimactic, with more questions than answers, continues to demonstrate how disconnected the developers are from the community and what we would consider decent campaign gameplay with decent optimization and less crashes.

I haven't played Call of Duty in a long time, but aside from visual visuals and voice acting, it doesn't feel like anything has changed. It's the same on-rails game you remember, just a little less entertaining owing to age.

The game is packaged inside a "Call of Duty HQ" where you can play each of the games by checking in and then logging out to run the game's executable. To say the least, it's inconvenient and frustrating to be able to return to the HQ without having to log out of the current game you're trying to play.

Mentioned games

Comments

oscar_shelley

I agree, the on-rails format is getting old. We need innovations.

11/06/2023

Author liked

Pawkt

Author

For sure.

11/06/2023

Virtuoso

Great video! explains it all in depth and you make good points instead of just saying "oh it's shit don't play" XD I've seen a few do that. I hope black ops gets a reboot, I really enjoyed BO1-3 and the campaigns, so hope they can bring that back

11/05/2023

Author liked

Pawkt

Author

I try not to let my bias interfere with discussing how a game can be seen as good or poor. While I and many other gamers around the world appear to despise Activision and Infinity Ward, I can say that, yeah. The game itself is OK; there is nothing wrong with it; it is just a little pricey and limited to only the campaign as an Early Access release, and possibly, hopefully, has some decent Zombie / Multiplayer, which I shall go back and check up on when it releases on November 10th.

11/05/2023

View 3 replies

No more comments. Why not add one?

Say something...